Commandments. Many
people associate religion with commandments. Even people who don’t consider themselves at all religious generally
know what you’re talking about when you say, “The Ten Commandments.” (If you ask what those commandments are,
don’t be surprised if almost no one can tell you anything much past “Thou shalt
not murder” and “Thou shalt not commit adultery.”)
Commandments: non-negotiable demands laid upon a person by
somebody else. Commandments are
frequently quite useful precisely because they are clear. Their usefulness may be more to the person
who is commanding than to the one commanded.
But anybody who has had much experience with relationships,
such as parenting for example, learns pretty soon that commandments can be
about as problematic as they can be helpful. There is something built into the human psyche that isn’t easy with
commandments. They engender guilt, fear,
and nearly always the specter of alienating someone if the commandment is not
observed. They also have a way of
kicking up resistance in lots of people. We are long past the day when people just accepted commandments lying
down. Try to force your will on someone
and you may get it, but quite likely not without a price, perhaps a very steep
one.
So to operate as if religion—what is supposed to give life
coherence and purpose—is fundamentally about keeping commandments is not unlike
trying to keep a person always at the stage of the toddler in her “terrible
two’s.” It might work for a short while,
but it won’t build a lasting, realistic relationship. There has to be another
way. And, in short, the way of
relationship is the way of love. Love,
in order to be love, involves respect. In St. Paul’s famous words, “Love is patient; love is kind; love is not
envious or boastful or arrogant or rude.” And that is just for starts.
"The Washing of Feet," Ghislane Howard, b. 1953 |
Now we are back at Maundy Thursday, the day we call “Maundy”
because on it Jesus gave a new
commandment. That commandment was “that
you love one another as I have loved you.” And what a surprise! At last a
commandment not about what you have to do in order to be acceptable to an
external authority, but about how we can actually embody and practice the
essence of the command-giver in ourselves and in community with others. You’ll notice that “love” by its very nature
suggests relationship. The most basic
form of love is the love I have for myself. And even there in my personal experience is the essential pair: the lover and the beloved. There is an “I” and there is a “self.” And “I” can decide to love my “self.” Indeed
one of the exercises I sometimes give to clients who have a hard time with
really loving themselves is to spend some time in front of a full length mirror
beholding themselves naked, looking at every part of their bodies and
appreciating them without criticizing. It doesn’t mean that they can’t decide to change this or that if it’s
possible. But truly loving ourselves is
exercising those things like patience and kindness towards ourselves without being incessantly critical or judgmental.
The love that begins with oneself does not end there. Indeed
it cannot because the very nature of reality is that everything is
connected. There is nothing that is
truly separate. In fact, the heart of
the human dilemma is the great illusion that we are separate—separate from God,
separated from each other, separated from the rest of nature. While there is a definiteness to our
individuation, our very individuality is linked to a greater commonality that
we share with everything else in the universe. Everything, including us, is, to
use philosopher Ken Wilber’s word, a holon within other holons.
Ken Wilber |
Chart illustrating holons |
That’s why we keep running aground when we fall into the trap of imagining that the world could really be run by force. Only for awhile will that work. But the reason it always fails on every level is that sheer force is counter to the energy that actually keeps the world going around. And you know what makes the world go round: love. Nothing else will work—not on a personal level, not on a familial level, not on a communal level, not on a national level, and not on an international level. That is not to say that love has an easy time of it. Love is not some sort of marshmallow that takes up a lot of space but has little weight. Nor is love without the capability of having a hard edge. Let Jesus’ example sink in: greater love has no one than this, that one lay down one’s life for one’s friends. Love is not about giving approval; it is about giving oneself away. And the Jesus who asks that we follow him models how love is never far from suffering. To love is to be vulnerable and to be vulnerable is sooner or later to be wounded, to know pain, to experience suffering.
The new commandment that Jesus gave his community on Maundy
Thursday in the middle of a footwashing is the essence of what it means to live
the Easter life. We’re nearing the end
of the Great Fifty Days of Easter. The whole point of Easter, as we saw on
Easter Day, is that we share the resurrection every single day of our
lives. Were it only about suffering and
pain who in the wide world would want that? But it is not “just” about suffering and pain. Jesus said to his community, “I have told you
these things so that my joy might be in you and that your joy might be
complete.” This is a man who was facing
an excruciatingly painful death, a death resulting from precisely the choices
he had made to come squarely down on the side of justice and liberation for
those least capable of taking up for themselves. And yet he is full of joy. How?
You and I could spend the rest of our lives trying to figure
that out. But we never will. Not until we live it. We can’t first figure
it all out neatly in our heads, give it a go, and test it out to prove it. If you’ve ever fallen in love, you know what I
mean.
Years ago the Supremes sang, “I’m Gonna Make You Love
Me.” For awhile you couldn’t turn on a
radio that you didn’t hear that.
I suspect it was the Supremes that really made it popular, but I think that on
some level it might be because we find appealing the idea that we could
actually make somebody love us. Even if
it worked for a time, we’d likely discover once more that you can’t make
someone love you, no matter how hard you try. All you can do is give yourself away—in service, attentively, caringly,
joyfully, gratefully, gladly—not counting the cost or begrudging what you give. Nothing is fool-proof or any other kind of proof. But at the end of the day it’s the only life
worth living, and the greatest risk is not that we might lose but that we’d be
too timid to try it and never find out what the Master meant by his joy being
in us or our joy being complete.
Diana Ross and The Supremes |
A sermon on the text of John 15:9-17
© Frank Gasque Dunn, 2018
No comments:
Post a Comment