T
|
his morning, two days after the horrendous burning of Nôtre
Dame, I reached for a dish towel. The
one on the rack was a red, white, and blue striped towel, a memento from
France. I’ve had it for close to twenty
years now, a gift from Robert, a friend who taught college French during the
time he and I lived in the same community.
Back from a trip to Paris he brought me the dish towel. The blue stripe bears an image of the Eiffel
Tower. The red, an image of Nôtre Dame.
Like lots of things of this sort, the towel has transitioned
from gift to everyday usage to being well on its way towards the rag pile. I wash it, dry it, use it, hang it up with
scarcely a thought of France or of Nôtre Dame, but surprisingly often on some
level remembering Robert, whose death several years ago I discovered belatedly
through meeting his son quite by surprise.
Something about the confluence of friendship, death, and the
near loss of Nôtre Dame is leading me at this moment to get beyond my shock and
grief over the fire. Why would I care so
much about an 850-year-old building if it were not a friend? Why would I perhaps lament its tragedy more
openly and obviously than I grieve for friend Robert?
The answer goes back a long time. My sixth grade class in
Conway, South Carolina, reached the chapter in our social studies text that
introduced me to the Middle Ages. There
on the page was a black-and-white photograph of the Cathedral of Nôtre
Dame. I was mesmerized by it. I looked at it for what seemed like (and
probably was) days. I learned what
flying buttresses were, the architectural significance of the Gothic arch, the
symbolism of the rose window, the cruciform pattern of medieval
cathedrals. In a day when international
travel was so rare as to be generally restricted to the rich, I could only
imagine actually seeing Nôtre Dame or any other cathedral. Yet, on some level,
I knew I had to.
So, after three years of college French but never a trip to
France until 2010, I stood one early fall morning in a long queue awaiting the
opening of the cathedral. Finding it darker
and much smaller than in my boyhood I’d imagined, I moved through its arches
and into its art-filled nooks and crannies trying to make out inscriptions on
tombs and fancying what the funeral of Louis XIV might have been like in that
sacred space. Later I stood on the Pont
Saint-Louis in something of a reverie, looking towards its east end,
remembering my boyhood dream as my eyes scanned those flying buttresses.
Not surprisingly, those who lack any such connection to the
sacred space react quite differently. There are more important things, they
say. What about this or that or the
other human need? What about someone
else’s burial ground being bulldozed to make a parking lot, or some suffering
far worse than a building become an inferno? What about…? What about…?
And the mantra of culture is not infrequently, “It will be replaced.” And even the harsh, “Get over it.” Replacement is never the same as
recollection. Getting over a loss never equals healing.
Today it’s Nôtre Dame, tomorrow it’s some place else. As Heraclitus described the life of the world,
“It ever was, and is, and shall be, ever-living fire, in measures being kindled
and in measures going out.”[1] As
my friend David Townsend, a medieval scholar, said yesterday, “This is the way
of cathedrals. They burn. They get bombed.
They collapse.” He was not being
dismissive, only telling the truth. The same is true when a human body becomes
a corpse. Rather than seeing this as an
invitation to “get over it,” or to ignore the pain, what I am beginning dimly
to see is that this “ever-living fire,” the constant change of which Heraclitus
speaks, is itself the Holy. God is not
working in spite of the fire. God
manifests as fire, just as God
manifests in the rose window, the roof, the spire, the altar of Nôtre
Dame. The Holy—called by whatever
name—is the energy, the Spirit expressed in every body in the cosmos. And the Holy is also the pure consciousness
that upholds and indwells the entirety of the universe—or, if you will, the
multiverse.
The morning after: the Cathedral still stands, battered and scarred but still with us. |
Holding onto the cathedral, the ground, the embodiment of
the sacred, is something so human we are not about to forfeit it. Yet whatever we gain by holding onto anything
we can count as loss compared to the liberation that comes with accepting the
flow and flux of change that are the nature of life. Beyond the things that come and go is the still
point, of which Eliot speaks:
Love is the
unfamiliar Name
Behind the
hands that wove
The
intolerable shirt of flame
Which human
power cannot remove.
We only live, only suspire
Consumed by either fire or fire.
…
And all
shall be well and
All manner
of thing shall be well
When the
tongues of flame are in-folded
Into the
crowned knot of fire
[1]
Quotation found on the internet at https://www.goodreads.com/author/quotes/77989.Heraclitus?page=2
, accessed April 17, 2019.
[2] T.
S. Eliot, “Little Gidding,” in The
Complete Poems and Plays 1909-1950 (New York: Harcourt & Brace, 1967),
pp. 144, 145.
1 comment:
Hello Frank, Thank you for sharing your very powerful words on ever living fire. I think of the Easter Vigil to come on Saturday with the fire of candles and the Light of the World resurrected. The fire of the cathedral during Holy Week seems to have significance as it will be rebuilt, its rebuilding will no doubt match what was before the fire, but hopefully, it will also reflect who we are globally as a people today, a people that is for the most part hungry for justice, equality, and respect for all through love for one another.
Post a Comment