Would that the Bible only said what we wish it did! Truth be told, the most ardent biblical
fundamentalist secretly wishes that the story of the rich young ruler, the
traditional name given to the character in today’s gospel, really didn’t say
what it does. So what do we do with
Bible stories and pronouncements of Jesus that we viscerally disagree
with? We doctor them up so that we can agree with them. Or, I suppose, alternatively, we just choose
not to listen, telling ourselves that it can’t matter much anyway.
Most of the time a sermon addresses the obvious. Today I want to address something not so
obvious. Rather than look at the rich
young ruler (so called because Matthew says he was young and Luke says he was a
ruler and all of them say he was rich), who to my mind is a very attractive
fellow—Mark says that Jesus, looking on him, loved him—I invite you instead to
study the disciples. Mark pictures them
as within earshot of the conversation between Jesus and the young man. He does not tell us if the disciples were
paying attention or not, or how they reacted to the incident, whether shocked
or nonchalant. What Mark does tell us is
that Jesus uses the incident as a “teaching moment.” He looks around and says to his disciples,
“How hard it will be for those who have wealth to enter the kingdom of
God!” And the disciples are astonished,
perplexed, puzzled at his words. Why? Some things never
change. And one of them is that cultures
the world over fix it so that the rich and powerful appear to be the darlings
of God. People get to believing
that. Hence we get the religion of
prosperity, which you may see in full display in the religion section of Barnes
and Noble or on a special book rack in your local Giant. Get close to God and you will prosper: that is the message. And the corollary is if you prosper, you must
be close to God. To tell a rich person today
(and, by the world’s standards, everyone in this church today is rich) that wealth
blocks the doorway to the kingdom of God does not go down any better than it
did in the first century. The decks are
loaded in favor of the rich, and everyone with any gumption knows it.
A quick reading of the gospels will reveal the difference between the Cross and Money |
This trick of acquiring tricks us into thinking that not
only things but spiritual qualities can be acquired, like outfits in a wardrobe
or necklaces in a jewelry box. Hence, we
not infrequently imagine, as does the man in the gospel story, that we can rack
up spiritual points too. “I have kept
all these commandments since my youth,” we might say. We are in good shape. We have the grades to prove it.
That is the way our human world is constructed. And that is why the disciples are so shocked
when Jesus says that it will be hard for those with riches to enter the kingdom
of God. That kingdom is a present
reality. It is here. It is now. It transcends time and death for sure, for it is clearly not of this
world. But God has pitched tent in the
field of human history and started serving a huge banquet in that tent, to
which you have been invited. The only
hitch is you have to go through certain “insecurity” procedures to get in. Empty your pockets. Take everything out of your briefcase. Computers, iPods, iPads, iPhones, checkbooks,
stocks, bonds, insurance, licenses, diplomas. No belt, no shoes, no backpack.
What might an "insecurity check" look like? |
Jesus does not say that it is impossible for the rich to
enter the kingdom, but rather that it is quite hard for them (us?) to do
so. Some point out that the little tiny
passageway in a Jerusalem gate big enough for one or may two small persons to
walk through, called a “needle’s eye” is what Jesus meant when he imagined
stuffing a camel into one. The camel
would hardly think it a possibility, or even a good idea, but rather a stupid
thing to try (if I may speak for camels). But I think Jesus probably meant something more like an actual camel
being squeezed through something as small as a real needle’s eye: not only is it hard, it is something you just
don’t really have any business trying to do.
It does not fit.
So what does fit? What
is fit? Who is fit for the domain of
God? Believe it or not, you are. You get to choose what you will do when you
go through “insecurity” checks. Just
like the rich young man in the gospel story, you and I may either empty our
lives and ourselves, or we can go away grieving because it is just so hard to
do that. Either response, of course,
assumes that we really want to live the life of God. You must be thinking, “So where is the good
news in any of this, especially for us relatively affluent Americans?” The good news is that all things are possible
to God. And this generous, loving,
beneficent God who sends rain on the just and unjust alike, has no agenda to
kick you out or keep you out of God’s life. It is God’s good pleasure to give you the kingdom, as Jesus once put
it. Nothing that I read in the gospel or
elsewhere tells us that Jesus gave the young man twenty-four hours to dispose
of all his possessions. What might have
happened if he had said, “OK, Good Master, I’m going to start today. Don’t know how long it might take me to get
there—but let me get started.” That is
not in the Bible, but suppose it were. Might the young man have ended the story differently?
Niko Katzanzakis' epitaph: "I hope for nothing, I fear nothing; I am free." |
I once was reading a book which suggested that it might be a
good idea to go through my house and look at all the things I was attached to
with the thought of giving them away. So
I did. At first it scared the bejeezes
out of me. I looked at paintings I
adored, furniture I treasured, and cases and cases of books I could never live
without. I imagined myself giving a
particular painting (still my favorite) called “The Juggler” to a young man in
my parish who was a pretty good juggler. I imagined parting with my books, and giving away Mama’s antique love
seat. Just the very thought of doing all
that began to make my heart feel lighter. I took a step that day towards the kingdom. Since then I have discovered what the sages
of the world have long been saying—that letting go is the only human problem
there is, and when we do it we begin to approach that splendid place of nothing
which is true freedom. Katzanzakis’s
tombstone bears the words, “I hope for nothing, I fear nothing, I am
free.” That, ironically, is what the
kingdom of God is about, and why it is that at the center of our faith stands a
naked man on a cross. That cross hangs
over our altars and over our doors because at every possible entrance to the
kingdom we are reminded that the quintessential quality of God’s life is
giving—giving one’s life—profligate, prodigal, limitless giving. And we generally don’t become like God in one
leap, but rather in incremental steps. Two per cent of our income this year, five next year, ten in a few
years, and more and more as time goes on in proportion to how much we are
blessed to get. We take a step and get
better at it. We take another step and
get even better at it. Then we begin to feel
the joy. We find ourselves tipping
waiters more generously, looking for causes that we can support to make our
world better, seeking out occasions to affirm a young person or to support an
older one. Step by baby step, we have
become children, taking on the characteristics of our Creator Parent.
Then one day, when Jesus turns and glances at us, we might find it in us to speak this truth: Lo, we have left everything and followed you. And that day will be the day that we will truly have come home to that surprising kingdom where many who were last shall be first.
A sermon based on Mark 10:17-31, Proper 23 Year B of
the Revised Common Lectionary
© Frank Gasque Dunn 2012,
revised 2018
No comments:
Post a Comment